Check out our 9 SEO Tips for search engine friendly web design! If you like it, please leave a comment! =) Thanks - Justin

How to Rank Well In Google

by Justin on November 4, 2008

If you’re reading my blog, I’m sure you’re interested in knowing what makes a site rank well in Google. This is the coveted knowledge all internet marketers seek. Aren’t we all looking for a page 1 ranking? Wouldn’t you kill to know how to achieve a #1 ranking?

As I mentioned in my last post, Rand Fishkin outed the #1 ranked site for “SEO Company”. The post did not claim that the site used black hat practices, but it does use fairly obvious link building methods. Their links screamed link anchor text optimization, which is a solid sign that they are manipulating their anchor text. This is something we all do, but Google does not like. Our job as SEOs is to make our links as natural as possible so that competitors cannot publicly out you. So let’s dig in deep here and look at what factors are allowing this site to rank #1 for “SEO Company”. Not only has it achieved a #1 ranking for this term, but it has also received site links. Site links are read as a type of “authority” by searchers because it makes the listing look more important. So how did this site rank number one in Google?

What we’re about to do is a twofold explanation; you will learn how to do two things. First, this will help you understand how to research a niche and determine how competitive it is and how long it may take to dominate the niche. I will show “how” the site is ranking. The second thing this allows you to do is look under the hood of your competition and figure out what they’re up to. If you go head to head with another internet marketer, here is how you’ll discover what they’re doing.

On Site Optimization

First, let’s dispel some bs ideas about SEO. First, the content is king thing. Second, that keyword density matters.

So check out the site: nationalpositions.com

A few things about the on site content. It isn’t that “great”. Of course, it isn’t “spammy”, it isn’t scrapped, it isn’t auto generated, and it is original. That is the point where “quality” no longer matters, unless you’re doing link bait of course. Overall though, there isn’t too much about this site’s home page that is really impressive. Also I  want you to use your browsers find command. The phrase “SEO Company” does not appear once! The word SEO appears 4 times and the word company appears 3 times, but neither of them together. According to SEO Quake the keyword density of SEO is 0.37 and the density of company is 0.19. So this 3% or 5% or whatever people bs about is NOT true. This information is not public, nobody knows it, and it is not that big of a factor in your ranking. Yes, using a keyword a few times does help, but continuous use of a keyword does not make a document more authoritative for the keyword. A page does not even require the use of the keyword to rank for it. You’re welcome to believe what you like, but here is an example of the #1 ranked site for “SEO Company”, but has a 0% keyword density for that phrase!

So what is the MOST important on site optimization factor in SEO? Well my buddy Griz talked about it the other day on his How to Make Money Online blog. It is the content enclosed in the title tag. The title tag is the most important on site factor that needs to be optimized. So let’s look at this site’s title tag.

Search Engine Optimization Los Angeles, SEO Los Angeles Company

As you’ll see, the site uses SEO and Company in their title tag. This gives their page strong on site authority for the words SEO and Company. This, plus the slight on site usage, is combined with one more factor (which I’ll discuss in a second) and allows them to rank for the term. One thing you’ll notice is that this site does not do what most would suggest, which is to put “SEO Company” first in the title. Generally, this would be a weakness for a site. You could be more competitive by putting SEO Company up front in the title, but this site has enough authority for “SEO Company” that they can place the keywords toward the end. (Again, we’ll get to that authority in a moment)

And lastly, let’s talk about semantics. So this site doesn’t use “SEO Company” exactly on their home page, but how did they manage to not trip the Google bomb flag and how did they rank for a term they do not use? Cough cough… its called semantics … cough cough. Go read my post about SEO and Semantics here.  Google understands word relationships. They have indexed the entire web, which allows them to learn some impressive things about the English language, how words relate, what niches words belong to, and what niches are related. SEO relates to all SEO terms, SEO niche relates to Internet Marketing niche, and the Internet Marketing niche relates to the Make Money Online niche.  There is a relationship, although separated, between the key phrases “SEO” and “How to Make Money Online”. So when I passed Griz a link earlier, it is going to help more than if I had a blog about dogs. Google knows SEO is related to making money online. (I hope that helps a little with Forbes Griz =P) I carry a good bit of authority so far for the term SEO and Google can evaluate the relation of this blog’s niche to Griz’s. And on the site we’re reviewing, Google can make a relation between “SEO Company”,  “SEO”, and “Search Engine Optimization”.

The lesson to learn from this is to focus more on using long tails and semantically related keywords than just using the exact phrase over and over. First, keyword density is not all it is made out to be. Why waste your content on excessive use of your keyword when you could simple reinforces it with semantically related keywords and long tails. This still supports your primary phrase and allows you to rank for more terms.

So HOW is it Ranking?

Ok, so if you were patient enough to read this far, you are still wondering “well how DID it rank”. It doesn’t use the exact phrase in the title. It doesn’t have a high density of the words. And it doesn’t even use the phrase once! They’re breaking all the content rules, but Google still considers them the top SEO Company.

It’s nothing new. It’s the thing that’s been said over and over. LINKS. And more importantly, KEYWORD anchored links.

Again, I won’t say content isn’t important. It plays a variety of roles. It is what your visitors read. It communicates keywords. And, it can be used to generate links. So there are times when content is important, but it is not what gets you ranked.

Again to recap. The content isn’t that great. No keyword density or any usage for the exact keyword. The separate keywords are used, but very little. All the traditional factors are almost absent. So let’s get our hands dirty and throw this site into SEO Elite. If you don’t have this program, get it. If you don’t have the money, I understand, but this is my MOST powerful tool and you’re about to see why. This program does link searches in all major search engines. It combines the results from them all. Then it goes to each of the sites that link to the site you entered and it checks the link, nofollow/dofollow, anchor text, page PR, site title, site IP, and more. It then puts it all together and performs useful calculations. You can quickly sort this information and understand exactly WHY a site ranks.

Here is a preview of the keywords present in the anchored links. Before I show it, I’d like to better explain how this works, let’s show an example. If a page links to this site using “LA SEO Company”, then another with “Awesome SEO Company”, and then another with “Internet Marketing Company”, you would get something like this.

  1. Company – 3
  2. SEO – 2
  3. Internet -1
  4. Marketing -1
  5. LA – 1
  6. Awesome – 1

(and so you know, the link that says “Internet Marketing Company” would help enforce the authority for the word Company, which would help the ranking for SEO Company, but not as much as the exact link “SEO Company”  would)

So here are the results from SEO Elite.

As you can see, the words SEO and Company dominate by a large margin. The vast majority of the links coming in use those keywords. This next image gives an even stronger view of the anchor text. This option allows you to input keywords and phrases to see how many anchors use that key phrase and calculations
the percentage.

As you can see, this site has a TON of links coming in with the words SEO and Company. Over HALF of all their links include the exact phrase “SEO Company”, while 56% feature the word Company and ALMOST 70% of their links include the anchor text SEO!

This is why they rank for SEO Company. One last time: Google ranks sites primarily based off the authority passed to them via links! And they use the words used as the anchors to determine rankings for keywords! The more anchored links you have for a key phrase, the higher you will rank for that key phrase (generally). Of course, there is more to SEO than that. But if you want a “dummies guide to SEO” in a quick nutshell, it’s in those two images. So if you’re not ranking for your keywords, I want you to ask yourself “how many keyword anchor links have I gotten for this site?”. When you get links, what words do you use? Do you use article marketing to grab anchored links? Do you use directory submissions? Link exchanges? Do you make effort to get the RIGHT anchor text? Do you even make the effort to GET the links? Do you spend more time getting links, reading, or writing content? (cough.. it should be getting links)

What about low quality links?

Ah… a topic I’ve talked about a few times and I was very excited when this example came up. Generally, I feel bad outing a site’s links publicly and will usually never do it, but Rand went ahead it did it for me, so there is no more harm in me using the example.

So you think directories are worthless? LOL

Look at this:

Look how many of their links are from directories, resource pages, link pages, and link exchanges. I even see an article site in there. Next, look at the titles. It’s all a bunch of unrelated pages. And want to see one of their strongest “SEO Company” links? This page is a PR 3 and links to it with the desired anchor text. The page is basically a list of exchanges. These are probably all exchanged and paid links. These are the links are the “gurus” tell you to NOT get. People go on about how exchanges are useless. They talk about how submissions are dead.

Well this site ranks for the phrase SEO Company. A phrase with 33,100 average monthly searches and an average CPC of $6.55. Yummy. Not the volume of stuff like “make money online”, but you could make a pretty penny with an Adsense blog in a niche with those stats. And this site got the rank using a ton of directories, link exchanges, submissions, resource pages, and probably paid links. It pays to know how to rank well in Google.

Can Low Quality Links Hurt?

Ah.. Well, maybe. Honestly, they are not the best long term strategy. If you’re making a flagship in an ultra competitive niche, I would not suggest these practices. Google doesn’t like link manipulation like this. Now that Rand has made this site’s link profile public and thrown it in the face of the SEO community, it is likely that this site will get slapped. This is why some of my fellow bloggers have stopped doing case studies. We show our stuff, it gets reported, and we get slapped. This is because; Google does not want you to build links. When I do SEO on bigger sites, like this one, I do not go all out on these types of links. Also, I would not use this as a professional SEO tactic. But, this is an SEO and Make Money blog. I’m not interested in talking about “ethical” SEO only. I’m interested in what gets a site ranked, what gets it traffic, and what gets me paid.

So here is something to consider. Google obviously relies heavily on hand edits and human inspections. Their also not great at detecting all SEO practices (they are pretty good though). This means you can get away with a lot as long as nobody notices or cares enough to report you. There are several things you can do to create enough doubt to prevent a reporting. The site we used as an example has been around for three years before someone finally outed them and it took Rand, who is one of the net’s most popular SEO’s, who is notorious for exposing sites in a way people don’t like. There isn’t nearly as much risk for your scrapbooking blog.

(btw, I’m not knocking Rand, his blog is awesome. I don’t think I’ll get his attention on page 2 or 3, but I’ll be a little worried when I make it to page one for SEO)

So That’s How It’s Done

I talk about SEO and will continue to talk about it, because I love the topic, but for the most part I just showed you how SEO works. There are fine details and particulars that we can discuss, but it really comes down to building authority with links. SEO Elite is a big purchase, but I hope this showed you some of the potential of the tool. It can do a lot more, but for this feature alone it is more than worth the money. The value of knowing exactly what your competition is doing is almost priceless. And honestly, the use of SEO Elite will teach you more about SEO than most SEO blogs on the internet. I read blogs for months before I purchased the program. Upon buying it, I spent days just running reports on sites, and it changed the way I saw SEO. No longer do you look at simplistic measures like link volume, but you get to see the specific details.

So go out and get links. And don’t depend on the advice of others unless they show you actual proof. Test stuff and try. Do some directory submissions and see if they help or not. Do article marketing and test that. Your confidence will increase when you actually get out there and build some links and prove to yourself what does and doesn’t work.

If you liked this post, help us out by sharing the post:

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • LinkedIn

Related Posts:

7 SEO Tips to Make More Money Online
How to Anchor Links – Better Backlinks Series
How to Target Keywords in 7 Simple Steps
Semantics for SEO
SEO Basics

{ 33 comments }

Nota Bene Consulting November 4, 2008 at 11:58 am

Justin,

First of all, this is a totally brilliant post. I had to read it twice – it took me long enough the first time – just to digest all the info here.

Your blog is one of my daily reads, and it continues to go from strength to strength.

Thank you.

James November 4, 2008 at 2:00 pm

Excellent post. I have to say that I share your opinion considering directories. For example, I have a site with about 300 links from directories ONLY.It has a PR3 and it is at the bottom of the first page in G.

DeMerchant November 4, 2008 at 4:58 pm

I’ve noticed also… and this is just a very quick observation… that taking some buying keywords in your title and URL seems to make google look at your site a little closer… like if your title is “Buy Pink Crayons” and your url is “buypinkcrayons.blogspot.com” it might be setting off some red spam flags… I haven’t really tested this theory, but it’s just an observation about what seems to be working and what isn’t

James November 4, 2008 at 8:23 pm

I’ve noticed that too.It seems that wasn’t the case several months ago, but now I have problems with that setting on blogger blogs.

I have several blogs that are not ranking for main keyword, but everything else is cool. This made me change the things a bit. I now make buypinkcrayons.blogspot.com but put Buy Pink Crayons Guide as a title. I hope I will avoid that red flag, it’s been killing my blogger blogs.

Don November 4, 2008 at 9:32 pm

Sorry about ending up in your Spam box with the previous comment. Akismet must hate me or something. Guess I’ll start using a different domain name, I think the word “affiliate” throws up a red flag.

I certainly agree with your post. If you can’t make it to the top with a few high quality anchored links, overwhelm them with low quality anchored links.

Anyway, here’s one for you. Google ‘Dallas SEO’ and tell me why dallasseo dot net is #1.

My theory is because the search term matches the domain name exactly. It appears he doesn’t need links (Explorer showed 5 for their domain, some not anchored, Google shows 0)

Don @ Affiliate Watcher

zania November 5, 2008 at 11:58 am

This is one of the most brilliant posts on SEO I have ever read!
It explains it all in great detail, confirms quite a few of my suspicions, and will help me a lot with a new niche blog I am setting up as I write this.
Fantastic!!

Antony November 5, 2008 at 10:13 pm

Justin, what is your take on reciprocal links? i have a friend who tells me they are certainly not as bad as people make out. He has been testing this for a while now on google. I am also going to test it out and see if this is true. I have a few blogger blogs, so i am going to post up a “resources” page and use this as a link page, then get the links back in return, but to the homepage and other posts in the blogs. Also, i will get the backlinks with various anchor text and just see what happens. Test and try folks.

Crayola Color Crayons November 5, 2008 at 11:08 pm

Link building is the secret solution, the foundation to long lasting sticking power in SERPS. It is tiring, and almost thankless job that doesn’t always yield immediate results.

But it is a necessary evil nonetheless, and this article clearly demonstrates it’s effectiveness.

dwep November 6, 2008 at 2:30 am

damn this was a good read justin, funny thing is i have popped in here a few times in the past, seeing your knowledge at the academy and all, and i just clicked on a link while doing some blog commenting and landed here. This was a great post man, i love seo elite, if you could do some tutorials getting into the advanced part of seo elite that would help so much, as many of us are clueless to its power like vic said awhile ago…

Mike November 6, 2008 at 6:35 pm

You have a pretty good blog, but it would be way better if you didn’t rehash other people’s work all the time. For example in this post and also one of your previous ones a citation to Aaron Wall’s site would have been appropriate.

P.S.: There’s very little chance that you will ever get on page 1 for “SEO”.

Justin November 7, 2008 at 10:46 pm

Hey Mike,
Thanks for trolling my comments, but I’m not going to get worked up over your comments.

I try to not rehash stuff, but 90% of my content here is basic SEO, so it isn’t really “new”. I just try to put my own personality into it and explain it in a why that I think makes sense.
I did not steal anything from Aaron’s blog. He’s post on this topic was more in reference to Rand’s policing than it was about how this site ranked. In a previous post, I cited the discussion on Sphinn. That article I linked to was the submission of Aarons blog.

And thanks for the encouragement Mike =P
I’m not too stressed about the rate of the progress of this blog. I’ve been open about that since the start. I’m a college student, so this is just a side little project I work on when I’m not doing stuff for school.
You should spend more time building your own site than trying to troll my comments and discourage me =P

cyberquest November 20, 2008 at 12:46 am

@Mike

Sure are a lot of assholes on the net, the supply is endless huh mike?

Keep up the good work Justin. It’s always refreshing seeing a new point of view.

Master Dayton November 6, 2008 at 7:07 pm

Hi Justin,

Great post! I’ve been reading all your blogs, and Vic’s and Grizz’s, as well, and I really appreciate all the great information that you guys offer to help beginners out. Many thanks!

Thai November 6, 2008 at 11:09 pm

Justin,

To start, how many directory submission runs should one do with directory submitter? I want to avoid the sandbox with one of my new niches

discount compression socks November 7, 2008 at 11:29 am

Woah holy donkey droppings! Excellent info Justin, clear and concise info more value packed than a lot of the PDFs i have on my hard drive…

Oregon Coast Lodging November 7, 2008 at 9:44 pm

Nice writing Justin, and I can concur that I could never do this business without SEO Elite. And in response to

QUOTE
“You have a pretty good blog, but it would be way better if you didn’t rehash other people’s work all the time. For example in this post and also one of your previous ones a citation to Aaron Wall’s site would have been appropriate.

P.S.: There’s very little chance that you will ever get on page 1 for “SEO”.”

You obviously don’t know Justin very well and if he wanted to I know he could with time take over whatever niche he so desires.

Macnabclan.

Justin November 7, 2008 at 10:47 pm

Thanks for the positive words. He’s just a troll =P

Penny G November 8, 2008 at 8:38 am

I read the whole post, got dizzy and took two aspirin. Thanks for the headache. I’d be glad to exchange links with anyone who’s into charity fundraising. I can’t remember if that’s something I’m supposed to do or to not do. I can’t keep track of what my keywords are or how many times I use them or don’t. I just do my thing and don’t really know if google likes me or not. This whole thing sounds so Jr. High school and 1984 with all the gossip and intrigue and backstabbing. I miss courtney Tuttle and Potpie Girl!!! Truth has been snatched from us and I am afraid to use the keyword s*@Ping word!

matt2257 November 9, 2008 at 9:24 pm

Hey Justin,

You competing with Griz on post length, or following in that fine tradition?

Either way, it is nice to read your posts as they are always well thought out.

Thanks man

Matt

thegreatmonkey November 12, 2008 at 8:44 pm

Thanks for the great article. I do have a very weak question that I assume has been asked before. What if you use anchored links to your site when posting comments on other blogs? So basically I would put my anchored text in the name field for this comment and all comments everywhere. Would this provide any benefit or is this just an absurd question? Plz be nice.

Nota Bene Consulting November 13, 2008 at 1:53 pm

Nice to see you ignoring the Troll – LOL

I see you rank well for ‘How To Rank Well In Google’, does the top right text help greatly?

Brochure template November 15, 2008 at 5:51 am

Thanks for sharing this post here. Directory and article submission should be made on monthly basis this may help you out.

Digital camera battery November 17, 2008 at 5:42 am

Very good post regarding SEO on page optimization. I have read your all related post to this post. For newbie as well as experience it is the great source of getting knowledge. Thanks for sharing your knowledge here through post.

Chad November 30, 2008 at 4:57 am

Man that was a long post, but one of the best I have ever read to show the importance of link building

great job,
Chad

Don R. December 2, 2008 at 5:25 pm

Hey, Justin

Just as I was plunging into depression because I think my site was smacked into the Sand Box, I stumbled onto your SEO blog through Griz’s site…really lifted my spirits. Thanks.

I was doing well on my Golf Talk site, placing on the first page – usually 1, 2 or 3 – on a “golf talking” search. Then, I decided to precede the title of each article already on the site with the words “Golf Talk -”. Almost immediately, my site does not show up on any searches, except specific article title searches. My hunch is that the title changes were read as spam by Google, and they threw me in the sand box. PR reading on my site is currently 0.

I haven’t done much in the month since that occured, except restoring all the posted titles to their original wording. Now, however, I am posting new content and securing new links, hoping it will show Google the site is not spam and motivating them to include it in searches again. Any suggestions you can offer to expedite this process would be really appreciated.

Thanks for sharing the depth of your knowledge and hard work.

Don R.

Anti Aging Pill December 2, 2008 at 10:03 pm

Good to see that there is some mention of semantics. A pretty integral topic as far as SEO is concerned imo.

Nigeria Small Business December 3, 2008 at 4:18 pm

I got here from Grizzly. This is a wonderful post. It is quite different from all others that I have read, and I must testify that you have cured me of some erroneous beliefs. Thanks for sharing the secrets that the so call gurus sell.

Kamal December 8, 2008 at 1:10 pm

Nice blog with very long list and detailed information. worth to read this blog. I hope sure, all will get benefit from this post.

Tina December 10, 2008 at 11:31 pm

Great post Justin. I’ve read a bucketload of yours, griz, and vic’s stuff and I get the same directive from them all: go get quality backlinks. However, nobody (that I can see so far) offers any advice on exactly HOW to get these backlinks. Article submissions are tough for me because many do not offer hyperlinking — only text accepted (does google still count a typed out web address as a backlink?). Without being in griz’s inner-circle i guess the rest of us will keep fumbling along. Any specific suggestions for obtaining quality backlinks? Do you have to establish multiple identities? It seems me linking to me wouldn’t carry as much authority. help.

-tina

James December 11, 2008 at 7:12 pm

Tina,

I strongly disagree with you. Griz and Vic have excellent advices on HOW to get backlinks. Justin has them too.

You need to visit and read posts under Get Started category on this blog (upper right corner, right bellow the Search bar). There you will find some good and detailed guidelines about what to do and how to do it.

Make Easy Money Online | RemiVladuceanu.com December 24, 2008 at 10:19 am

Okay. This is pretty much known information especially about the importance of getting links. If people around here are reading Griz’ posts and how he gets backlinks with proper anchor text, they pretty much solved the puzzle.

But I wanna thank you for pointing out a few interesting things about Google and semantics. And also about SEO Elite. I also use this tool and since I started using it I got so used to it that I could never go back to researching with other tedious methods that don’t give back so much information then SEO Elite. ;)

Also I wanna thank you for clarifying the directory submission issue that I personally didn’t know it could still work.

I just want to ask you one question:
what is your opinion on bringing links back to our sites using keyword anchored text in the name field by commenting on other niche related blogs? (Like I did over here)

Overall I have to say this article is one of the few good quality pieces of information standing way above the usual crappy posts of miss leading blog posts about SEO,, that only gets you to ‘information overload’.

Thanks again and take care! And Happy Holidays!

Remi Vladuceanu
http://www.remivladuceanu.com

Tim February 23, 2009 at 10:01 am

Rand outed NP over a month ago now yet it still sits at NO.2 for “SEO company” . Everyone who ranks highly for competitive keywords uses anchor text manipulation, the way to prevent being slapped for it is to vary it as much as possible. When I started my blog I decided I would vary my anchor text between 60 phrases each one backing the other up.

I know there is a lot of talk about inbound links being able to hurt you but I really don’t see how they ever could. If inbound links could hurt you, you could literally pull down your competition by spamming their site all over the web.

I do however think outbound links can hurt you and I think it relates back to all the “bad neighbourhood” argument. You will have noticed Griz has a PR0, now I know he still ranks highly but you have to wonder why the big G have slapped the site. I have linked out to Griz a couple of times but I may be more careful in the future.

High quality links are more efficient but a shed load of low quality links still count for something. I examined the top few sites in the SEO industry in the UK – All use directories, all use article marketing and most had fewer than 5% of their links coming from pages with PR. Says it all really. :)

Magic tricks Revealed June 2, 2009 at 7:49 am

Hey, I just came across your blog and wanted to tell you that you have great articles. All the best. Cheers, George

Comments on this entry are closed.